AI Governance ยท Executive

AI Governance Council: Decision Rights, Cadence and Artefacts

Amestris — Boutique AI & Technology Consultancy

Many organisations start AI with pilots and informal approvals. That works until AI becomes a shared capability: multiple teams, multiple vendors, more sensitive data, and higher expectations from boards and regulators. At that point, decisions need a home.

An AI governance council is a practical mechanism for decision-making. Done well, it accelerates delivery by removing ambiguity and standardising controls. Done poorly, it becomes a bottleneck.

Start with decision rights, not membership

The council exists to make a small set of repeatable decisions:

  • Risk tiering. Which use cases are low/medium/high risk and what controls apply (see risk appetite).
  • Approved patterns. Which architectures and guardrails are standard (see control tower and enterprise AI architecture).
  • Data boundaries. What data can be used, where it can be processed, and how it is retained.
  • Exceptions. When to allow deviations, and what evidence is required.

Once decision rights are clear, membership becomes obvious: the people who can approve, fund, or accept risk.

Keep the cadence lightweight and predictable

A common pattern is a weekly 30-minute triage plus a monthly deep-dive:

  • Triage. New use cases, exceptions, and release approvals for higher-risk changes.
  • Deep-dive. Trends, incidents, audit readiness, and strategic vendor decisions.

Predictability matters: teams should know when decisions will be made and what evidence is required.

Standardise the artefacts that make decisions fast

The council should require a small set of reusable artefacts:

Make outcomes measurable

Governance should improve delivery, not just reduce risk. Measure:

  • Lead time from proposal to approval (by risk tier).
  • Incident rate and severity trends.
  • Reuse of standard patterns vs bespoke builds.
  • Audit readiness: how quickly evidence can be produced.

The goal is a council that turns AI into a managed capability: faster decisions, clearer accountability, and fewer surprises.

Quick answers

What does this article cover?

How to run an AI governance council that makes decisions quickly while keeping risk and accountability clear.

Who is this for?

Executives, risk leaders and technology heads scaling AI across multiple teams and products.

If this topic is relevant to an initiative you are considering, Amestris can provide independent advice or architecture support. Contact hello@amestris.com.au.